Professional

John P. Kotter – Leading Change

In this context, John P. Kotter lists the most general lessons to be learned from both (I) the more successful cases and (II) the critical mistakes as follows:
I. Lessons from the more successful cases:
1. Establishing a sense of urgency
* Examining market and competitive realities
* Identifying and discursing crises, potential crises, or major opportunities
2. Forming a powerful guiding coalition
* Assembling a group with enough power to lead the change effort
* Encouraging the group to work together as a team
3. Creating a vision
* Creating a vision to help direct the change effort
* Developing strategies for achieving that vision
4. Communicating vision
* Using every vehicle possible to communicate the new vision and strategies
* Teaching new behaviors by the example of the guiding coalition
5. Empowering others to act on the vision
* Getting rid of obstancles to change
* Changing systems or structures that seriously undermine the vision
* Encouraging risk taking and nontraditional ideas, activities, and actions
6. Planning for and creating short-term wins
* Planning for visible performance improvements
* Creating those improvements
* Recognizing and rewarding employees involved in the improvements
7. Consolidating improvements and producing still more change
* Using increased credibility to change systems, structures, and policies that don’t fit the vision
* Hiring, promoting, and developing employees who can implement the vision
* Reinvigorating the process with new projects, themes, and change agents
8.Institutionalizing new approaches
* Articulating the connections between the new behaviors and corporate success
* Developing the means to ensure leadership development and succession
II. Lessons from the critical mistakes:
1. Not establishing enough sense of urgency – A transformation program requires the aggressive cooperation of many individuals. Without motivation, people won’t help and the effort goes nowhere.
2. Not creating a powerful guiding coalition – Companies that fail in this phase usually underestimate the difficulties of producing change and thus the importance of a powerful quiding coalition.
3. Lacking a vision – Without a sensible vision, a transformation effort can easily dissolve into a list of confusing and incompatible projects that can take the organization in the wrong direction or nowhere at all.
4. Undercommunicating the vision – Transformation is impossible unless hundreds or thousands of people are willing to help, often to the point of making short-term sacrifices.
5. Not removing obstacles to the new vision – Sometimes the obstacle is the organizational structure: narrow job categories can seriously undermine efforts to increase productivity or make it very difficult even to think about customers. Sometimes compensation or performance-appraisal systems make people choose between the new vision and their own self-interest. Perhaps worst of all are bosses who refuse to change and who make demands that are inconsistent with the overall effort.
6. Not systematically planning and creating short-term wins – Creating short-term wins is different from hoping for short-term wins. The latter is passive, the former active. In a successful transformation, managers actively look for ways to obtain clear performance improvements, establish goals in the yearly planning system, achieve the objectives, and reward the people involved with recognition, promotions, and even money.
7. Declaring victory too soon – Instead of declaring victory, leaders of successful efforts use the credibility afforded by short-term wins to tackle even bigger problems.
8. Not anchoring changes in the corporation’s culture – Change sticks when it becomes “the way we do things around here,” when it seeps into the bloodstream of the corporate body. Until new behaviors are rooted in social norms and shared values, they are subject to degradation as soon as the pressure for change is removed.

Finally, John P. Kotter writes, “There are still more mistakes that people make, but these eight are the big ones. In reality, even successful change efforts are messy and full of surprises. But just as a relatively simple vision is needed to guide people through a major change, so a vision of the change process can reduce the error rate. And fewer errors can spell the difference between success and failure.”

To get this amazing book: http://www.amazon.com/Leading-Change-John-P-Kotter/dp/0875847471/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1282058444&sr=8-1

Comments Off more...

FXO vs FXS Telephone Equipment

A difference between two technologies is described here:

An FXS interface provides power (battery) to FXO equipment and generates ring signals
(e.g. The phone jack on the wall)

An FXO interface receives power (battery) and receives ring signals
(e.g. The phone line port on a telephone set)

Always check the sense of the device whether it is labeled FXS or FXO, as some vendors get it backwards and your device will provide battery when you expect it to behave as a station and receive battery. Be careful!

Comments Off more...

Canadian Area Codes

Comments Off more...

Some more books to read – Advice of Change Management Guru

John Carter “Leading Change”

William Bridges “Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change”

Henry Mintzberg – various books

Peter Block “Flawless Consulting: A Guide to Getting Your Expertise Used”

The Blog of David Maister

Also consider grandfathering provision for CMC certification

Comments Off more...


Myers-Briggs: ENTP Again!

Comments Off more...

LSAT Tip Collection

http://www.silenttimer.com/handbook/standardizedtest/lsat/lsat_tips.php

Sample test to take “cold”, without studying

http://www.lsat-center.com/lsat-page4.html

Comments Off more...

How much is your degree worth?

According to the U.S. Census Bureau (2005), with the following degrees, here is how much you can expect to make in your lifetime:

  • Doctors Degree: US$ 4,400,000
  • Masters Degree: US$ 2,500,000
  • Bachelors Degree: US$ 2,100,000

Big bang for associate degree

Now that you know all that, here’s what I came up with (using a “discount rate” of 5% for you detail bugs who care) for the increase in lifetime income from a two-year degree:

Associate degree
Payoff hits triple digits for some
Average $116,550 Liberal arts $63,667
Business $92,908 Social science $79,013
Computers $148,695 Science $104,521
Engineering $192,660

As you can see, the average increase in income from an associate degree, compared to what a high-school graduate would get, is about $116,550 today. Subtract the average cost of tuition and books at a two-year school — about $2,500 — and you’re way, way ahead. AA degrees in engineering and computers have the biggest payoff.

Present Value Increases:

Bachelor’s degree
Lifetime gain can be huge
Average $308,588 Liberal arts $243,883
Business $349,028 Social science $210,080
Computers $443,180 Science $283,286
Engineering $497,930 Education $108,461
Master’s degree
A mixed result
Average $180,010 Social science Less than 0
Business $375,780 Science $136,873
Engineering $362,092 Education $106,388
Liberal arts Less than 0
Professional degree
Big-time payoff
Average $716,927
Law $748,865
Medicine $977,601
The PhD
Science pays more
Average $187,920
Science $299,190
Comments Off more...

Certifications

MBA, CISSP, GCIA, GCFW, GSEC CISM, CISA, CEH, PMP

Comments Off more...

Strengthsfinder Profile

Here is what was discovered about me

Strengthsfinder v1: Activator, Self Assurance, Strategic, Achiever, Maximizer

Strengthsfinder v2: Activator, Relator, Strategic, Achiever, Competition


Copyright © 1996-2010 The "E" Zone. All rights reserved.
iDream theme by Templates Next | Powered by WordPress